Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Current Events - April 9, 2013


Party at the White House, Again

Sequester? What sequester? The White House is still closed to the public and little school children on spring break but it'll be open tonight as President Obama hosts a slew of celebrities for yet another lavish party.
Tonight’s special White House “celebration” of Memphis soul music marks the tenth time President and Mrs. Obama have been treated to an exclusive East Room “command performance” of American music featuring major stars, past and present.
While the performances are televised and celebrate the nation’s culture, some may wonder whether during an era of soaring deficits it is wise to stage what are also in effect private parties for the first couple.

And with this evening’s event, the performances are officially part of the “sequester-free zone” at the White House. As is well known, the daily White House tours did not make the cut.

And yes, this is happening on your dime.
To attend any event at the White House, one must be invited. (The White House is now closed for public access by members of the general public.) And especially this one, with Hollywood and musical stars--and with remarks by the president of the United States.
Since it's an official event, we know who's picking up the tab. The taxpayers.
If you're feeling left out, you can join the party online tonight when the event is streamed live online at whitehouse.gov.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2013/04/09/party-at-the-white-house-again-n1562402

Obama declares Tuesday ‘National Equal Pay Day,’ despite paying female staffers less than male counterparts

President Barack Obama officially declared Tuesday “National Equal Pay Day,” symbolically marking how much extra work women supposedly must perform to reach pay parity with men.

“Women — who make up nearly half of our nation’s workforce — face a pay gap that means they earn 23 percent less on average than men do. That disparity is even greater for African-American women and Latinas,” Obama said in a statement issued Monday. “On National Equal Pay Day, we recognize this injustice by marking how far into the new year women have to work just to make what men did in the previous one.”

While Obama, who signed the 2009 Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act to make filing employment-discrimination suits easier, has repeatedly lamented statistics showing that men generally earn more than women, the Obama White House has failed in recent years to pay female employees the same amount as male ones.

Coburn: GAO report reveals $95 billion in government overlap

The Government Accountability Office’s third annual report on government duplication revealed 17 areas of government fragmentation and overlap and 14 areas of potential cost savings.

Oklahoma Republican Sen. Tom Coburn said that the amount of overlap revealed in the report and in previous years could serve to cover the cost of the sequester.

“While millions of Americans have been doing more with less, the federal government continues to do less with more,” Coburn, who passed an amendment three years ago requiring this annual report, said in a statement. ”The $95 billion in overlap identified in this report, combined with the $200 billion in overlap identified in GAO’s previous two reports, could easily cover the costs of sequestration. Yet, instead of preventing furloughs, reopening air traffic control towers and restoring public access to White House, Congress and the administration continue to defend billions of dollars in duplicative programs that are little more than monuments to the good intentions of career politicians in Washington.”

Tuesday’s report adds to the existing GAO data on government inefficiencies as they pertain to fragmentation, duplication and overlap. GAO’s two prior reports revealed 131 areas of fragmentation, duplication and overlap and issued 300 recommendations.

According to a letter to Congress from Comptroller General Gene L. Dodaro, GAO released in conjunction with the report, the GAO evaluated the progress made on the area GAO highlighted.

“We found that the executive branch agencies and Congress have made progress in addressing the 131 areas we identified in 2011 and 2012,” Dodaro explained in his letter. “As of March 6, 2013, the date we completed our audit work, 16 of the 131 areas were addressed; 87 were partially addressed; and 27 were not addressed.12 We also found that of the approximately 300 actions needed within these areas, 65 were addressed; 149 were partially addressed; and 85 were not addressed.”

Tuesday’s report, “2013 Annual Report: Actions Needed to Reduce Fragmentation, Overlap, and Duplication and Achieve Other Financial Benefits” revealed an additional 31 areas with 81 recommended actions.

Some of the more egregious examples within Tuesday’s report, highlighted by Coburn’s office, include:

-679 renewable energy initiatives at 23 federal agencies and their 130 sub-agencies cost taxpayers $15 billion in FY 2010.

- 76 programs to prevent or treat drug abuse are spread across 15 agencies, costing $4.5 billion in FY 2012.

-Three federal offices are involved in overseeing catfish inspections.

-159 contracting organizations in 10 different Defense Department components provide defense foreign language support. GAO estimates $50 to $200 million in potential savings by eliminating this duplication.

-The Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) offers 69 different language services. GAO found 23 instances of overlap involving 43 of these services, accounting for $149 million, or nearly 20 percent, of the BBG’s FY 2011 annual appropriations.

-21 programs, including eight tax expenditures, are in place to help students save for, pay, and repay the cost of higher education, annually costing $45 billion, $104 billion in financial loans, and $25 billion in lost revenue from tax spending.

-Six programs to employ and train veterans are operated by two government agencies, which spent $1.2 billion in FY 2011 to serve 880,000 participants. The GAO found, “Despite these efforts, the unemployment rate for veterans who have recently separated from the military is higher than that for other veterans and nonveterans.”

-The Department of Commerce’s National Technical Information Service (NTIS) was established in 1950 and tasked with collecting and distributing certain reports. Despite the fact that nearly 75 percent of these reports are now available online for free, NTIS continues to charge the public, and even other federal agencies, for these reports. GAO explains, “These results show that NTIS disseminates and charges for many reports that overlap with information that is available for free from federal agencies and other public websites.”  Over ten years ago, the GAO issued a report highlighting this clear overlap and government waste. In a November 2012, GAO “estimated that approximately 621,917, or about 74 percent, of the 841,502 reports were readily available from one of the other four publicly available sources GAO searched.” Even more, 95 percent of those on other websites, were available for free. Making the government looking even more foolish, GAO explains, “The source that most often had the reports GAO was searching for was another website located at http://www.Google.com.”

-Six separate offices at the Department of Homeland Security are involved in research and development. In one example, “two DHS components awarded five separate contracts that each addressed detection of the same chemical. Moreover, DHS did not have the policies and mechanisms necessary to coordinate or track research and development activities across the department.”

Feds pay millions for data they could have just Googled, audit finds

 Congress’s top auditor said Tuesday that the Commerce Department has been charging other government agencies millions of dollars for reports that the other agencies could just as easily have gotten online, for free.

The Government Accountability Office, releasing its third annual report on duplication in the federal government, said 74 percent of all the reports held by the National Technical Information Service were available elsewhere, usually for free — and often just by a simple Google search.

“The source that most often had the reports GAO was searching for was another website located at http://www.Google.com,” the auditors said.

The reports don’t amount to much — the agency reported revenues of $1.5 million in fiscal year 2011 — but overall, duplication and waste are likely costing the federal government billions of dollars a year, the auditors said.

In one example GAO said the federal government paid for 679 separate renewable energy programs in 2010. The 2009 stimulus alone created or boosted 157 of the initiatives. Altogether, 23 federal agencies have renewable energy programs.

But the Government Accountability Office said it can’t even begin to measure how much overlap there is because the agencies don’t keep sufficient records to evaluate that.

GAO said the Defense Department has so many different branches that each pay separately for foreign language services, but if the department were to coordinate it could save hundreds of millions of dollars a year.

COMMUNISM SURVIVOR BLASTS SALEM GUN GRABBERS: “YOU DON’T KNOW WHAT FREEDOM IS!”

”You don’t know what freedom is because you never lost it!”  With a pointed finger Manuel Martinez called out Anti-Gun Committee Leader Floyd Prozansky during heated testimony on Friday.  You can bet Prozansky got the message.

To quote Mr. Martinez:

“malicious individuals, masquerading as Democrats,.. established … a dictatorial regime … in my nation called Communism, Socialism, Stalinism, Marxism, and whatever other named -ism you want to put on it.  The reason why it was done was to take away the guns from the People.”

Mr. Martinez escaped the brutal Communist regime in Cuba in 1954.  His testimony included how citizens under Castro were first disarmed by legislation similar to that being shepherded along by Gun-Grabber in Chief Floyd Prozanski.  Defenseless, many Cuban Citizens were later summarily slaughtered.

Having been present at the testimony, I can assure you even the Liberal hacks in the press pool were visibly shaken.  The expressions on the Senators faces … well they spoke for themselves (I’ve included a few stll shots here).  I’d wager no one in room did not feel a chill up their spine, or a tear in the corner of their eye, as Martinez described scenes of sons being torn from their mothers arms, and shot dead in the street, because they lacked the means to protect themselves.  He spoke from the heart:  no notes or teleprompter required.
Martinez Senator Composite
TL:  Martinez points finger and let’s loose – “You don’t know what freedom is!”  TR:  Stunned … Sen. Jackie Dingfelder.  BL:  Arnie Roblan seems visibly affected.  BR:  Gun-Grabber in Chief Prozanski can’t move things along fast enough

Enjoy Mr. Martinez’s testimony which is provided unedited and in full HD.  Near as I can tell you won’t find it anywhere else in the Portland mainstream media.

[For completeness and searchable reference I have transcribed Mr. Martinez's testimony below.  However, it really has to be heard and seen to be appreciated.]

My name is Manuel Martinez.  Born in Cuba.  American Citizen for more than 40 years.  I oppose any manipulation, any regulation or disruption of the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.

In 1957 a Revolution … individuals … malicious individuals, masquerading as Democrats, revolutionaries, established a regime … a dictatorial regime … in my nation.  Called Communism, Socialism, Stalinism, Marxism, and whatever other named -ism you want to put on it.  The reason why it was done was to take away the guns from the People.   The right of the People to wear guns.  That is a God-given Right.  It’s not given by anybody.  It’s not given by any group.   It’s the same thing as freedom, which is a God-given Right.  And no one, absolutely no one, has the authority to take it away.  To cease to defend the Second Amendment, and my God-given Right of freedom, will cease only with my death.

I’ve been through it.  I’ve been there.  You people don’t know what freedom is because you never lost it.  You haven’t been tortured.  You haven’t been [sic] assassinations, you haven’t been mothers begging for the life of their son not to be killed because the only reason is they wanted to be free.  And they killed the mothers and they killed the son.

So my way to protest, the way to oppose, because if we keep tangling with the Second Amendment, we are open the same way that Cuba was open for Communism.  China, Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Venezuela, on and on.  A dictatorial regime that will destroy this country, in the same way that it destroyed those ones that I mentioned to you.

Gun Control does not protect anybody.  It doesn’t protect the citizens, it doesn’t protect the People.  The only reason for gun control is for the Government to be protected from the Citizens.  In that way the Government can manipulate the People and subjugate them.  That’s what’s happened in Cuba for 52 years … 54.  

I came here for freedom.  At the time I came here it was different.  This country opened their arms for me … I couldn’t get it in Cuba.  And they opened their arms for me, I probably wouldn’t get it here today.  I hope that I get clear with you, and you understand my point of view.  I think that concludes my testimony.  

Freedom!  Freedom!

 http://daylightdisinfectant.com/communism-survivor-blasts-salem-gun-grabbers-you-dont-know-what-freedom-is/

Your Children Belong to Us

A Tulane professor and MSNBC host named Melissa Harris-Perry, in a video found here, suggests that your children do not belong to you, but rather, they belong to the collective. If only we can "break through the idea that children belong to their parents or kids belong to their families," she says, then we can make "better investments" in public education.

The problem with our educational system is that not enough taxpayer money has ever been applied to it, she says. No number of college degrees can make this assumption plausible. Since the 1970s, federal spending on public education has
more than doubled, and the results have been not only dismal, but regressive in many areas. So a logical person might come to the opposite conclusion -- that increased government influence in education has a negative effect on our children, if educating them about math, science, and linguistic skills is indeed the aim of "education."

But traditional educational metrics are not what she is talking about. That stuff is just a red herring. No, her true intention is purely socialistic, and the motive is political, not scholastic.

She suggests that children should not be educated by their families, but rather, they should be educated by the state in a manner which the state approves. Since the state administers the education system, it decides upon the textbooks that children read, and the lessons they learn. And if only the state can be given more authority and resources to do so, the collective will thrive.

Another, more famous socialist
said something quite similar:


"Let me control the textbooks and I will control the state. The state will take youth and give to youth its own education and its own upbringing. Your child belongs to us already... what are you?"

These are the words of Adolf Hitler. One has to be careful with references to Nazism, because often they are interpreted as outrageous hyperbole. But this is not hyperbole. The purpose of both statements is to destroy the individualism that results from unique family and cultural experiences, and replace it with a homogenized humanity that is engineered by the state. What are you, after all, in the context of the greater collective?

Individualism is the problem, and collectivism is the solution. Occasionally, while outwardly promoting the supposedly high-minded ideas of "equality" and "fairness," the mask slips and progressives expose themselves as hardline adherents to this thoroughly un-American and extremely dangerous socialist concept.

This was Ms. Harris-Perry's moment. And perhaps more frightening than the video itself is the fact that too few Americans seem frightened by it.

Networks Give Rutgers Basketball Scandal 41 Mins., Gosnell Baby Murder Trial 0

The Rutgers basketball story continues to transfix the media, and why shouldn’t it? Mike Rice, the disgraced former Rutgers basketball coach allegedly killed a woman and at least seven viable, born-alive babies “by plunging scissors into their spinal cords” in his filthy, macabre “house of horrors” abortion clinic.

Oh wait, my mistake. Rice was fired last week from Rutgers over video of him shoving, kicking and yelling at his players, throwing basketballs at them and – most damning – using “homophobic slurs.” That’s made Rice the most notorious villain in America. And in one week it earned him 36 network news stories clocking in at 41 minutes, 26 seconds of air time on ABC, CBS and NBC.

Now, had Rice been accused of killing a woman and eight babies, he’d be enjoying the same anonymity as Kermit Gosnell– provided the killings were carried out in an abortion clinic. Gosnell is the West Philadelphia abortionist who ran an unimaginable charnel house of a “clinic,” for 30 years. Witnesses testified that he may have murdered over 100 babies outside the womb. Gosnell’s trial, underway for weeks, has featured wrenching testimony and horrific details. And it has received exactly zeroseconds of airtime on the broadcast networks.

Let’s break it out by network.

ABC
  • Rutgers: 8 min., 1 sec.
  • Gosnell: 0 min., 0 sec.
CBS
  • Rutgers: 14 min., 27 sec.
  • Gossnell: 0 min., 0 sec.
NBC
  • Rutgers: 18 min., 58 sec.
  • Gosnell: 0 min., 0 sec
Last week, Media Research Center founder Brent Bozell and 20 other leaders of the conservative movementpublicly demanded the networks end their blackout of the Gosnell trial. They haven’t. Perhaps they’ve been too traumatized by Rutgers and the “shocking videotapes,” as ABC’s Jenna Wolfe called them on “Good Morning America” April 6. NBC’s Erica Hill also called them “shocking” on that morning’s “Today.” At CBS “This Morning” on April 3, anchor Norah O’Donnell found the video “stunning.”

“We`ve all been in environments, basketball courts, locker rooms, where the coaches can get fiery, they can get animated with you, CBS special correspondent James Brown allowed, “but putting your hands on a player and engaging in that kind of – those kind of homophobic slurs and abusive behavior, you don`t treat animals that way.”

And you certainly don’t call them “faggot” or “fairy.” Rice’s bullying might have been excused had he not used those terms. In fact, they merited a special apology from Rutgers President Robert Barchi “to the LGBT community and all of us who share their values for the homophobic slurs shown on that video. I personally know how hurtful that language can be.”

ABC was so troubled by the antics of an overbearing basketball coach that on the April 5 “World News Tonight,” correspondent David Muir promised that the network’s “20/20” news magazine show “is now exploring the bigger question, the conversation started by that tape this week. How common is this bad behavior, how early does it start?”

And explore it they did, with Muir talking to “a mother devastated by that video the nation watched this week. Her son towering over that Rutgers coach, but still defenseless.” Stacy Williams, the mother of Rutgers player Austin Johnson, told Muir, “We have to now empower our children to say enough is enough and that we are not gonna stand idly by because you dangled a scholarship in our hands and allow you to get away with all manners of evil.”

“All manners of evil” … like severing a newborn’s spinal chord? Like JB said, “you don`t treat animals that way.”

Leftist “Media Reform” Conference in Denver

Denver, Colorado: Disgraced CBS newsman Dan Rather returned with an appearance in a new film, “Shadows of Liberty,” which had its U.S. premiere at the “National Conference for Media Reform” in Denver last Thursday night. The film—and Rather—contend that corporate power has taken control of the American media, leaving the American people uninformed about current events.

The conference is based on the premise that the media are not left-wing enough, and that government regulations and subsidies are necessary to restore the concept of a “public media” that people can rely on for news and information. A big focus of this year’s conference is urging the Obama Administration to promote more federal control over the Internet, under the guise of “net neutrality.”

Rather, who left CBS after being caught up in a scandal in which fake documents were used to smear former President George Bush, was hired by billionaire Mark Cuban for his HDNet channel, which is now called AXS TV. He narrates a little-watched show called “Dan Rather Reports.”

It is telling that he has now become a hero of the far-left.

The film also featured Julian Assange of WikiLeaks, whose service to the Russians included hosting a program on the Kremlin-funded Russia Today (RT) channel, before he went into hiding from rape charges.

While the film had its good parts, such as a segment on the official cover-up in the TWA 800 tragedy, the constant refrain about “corporate power” being at the root of all major media scandals was not only disputable but tiresome. It demonized President Ronald Reagan for deregulating the media, a policy decision that gave rise to conservative talk radio and more, not less, diverse voices in the media.

The rise and influence of left-wing media, including outlets such as MSNBC, was completely ignored in “Shadows of Liberty.”

Five years in the making, the film seemed strangely out of date, focusing on an alleged “media monopoly in American journalism” when one of the featured commentators, Amy Goodman, who is a star at this conference, claims to be broadcasting on 1,149 stations around the world. This figure includes dozens of public TV stations in the U.S.

The liberal tilt of public broadcasting was also ignored in the film.

Goodman, co-host of Democracy Now!, is so far to the left that she ran a special program honoring Castro collaborator Che Guevara. Her co-host, Juan Gonzalez, who also writes for the New York Daily News, was a member of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), which spawned the terrorist Weather Underground.
Gonzalez is on the conference panel called “The Media’s Influence on the Immigration Debate,” which is described as dealing in part with “the Republican Party’s anti-Latino positions…”

In 2008, Goodman and Gonzalez used their program as a platform for Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, so they could dispute then GOP-vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin’s charge that they were terrorist associates of Barack Obama.

Another star at the conference is University of Illinois Marxist Professor Robert McChesney, the co-founder of Free Press, the sponsor of the conference. He is identified as a “media scholar,” even though he hosts a public radio show that excludes conservatives

In an article in the socialist Monthly Review, “Journalism, Democracy, and Class Struggle,” McChesney had declared, “Our job is to make media reform part of our broader struggle for democracy, social justice, and, dare we say it, socialism.”

He once introduced Obama’s notorious anti-American pastor, Jeremiah Wright, at an event to celebrate the socialist publication.

At the time, we noted that Free Press had received at least $1 million from the Open Society Institute of billionaire George Soros, a mega-capitalist who seems to have dedicated his life to overturning the system that made him wealthy.

However, a major new player at this year’s Free Press conference is the New America Foundation, another Soros-funded group. Indeed, a Friday morning session, “More Diversity, Less Consolidation: How to Change the Media,” will be moderated by Mark Lloyd, who is in charge of the New America Foundation’s “Media Policy Initiative.” A former Associate General Counsel and Chief Diversity Officer at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Lloyd had praised the Marxist revolution in Venezuela, where the regime has attempted to control or even eliminate private media sources.

Funding for the New America Foundation includes $1 million each from:
  • The Ford Foundation
  • The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Eric and Wendy Schmidt (the Google chairman and his wife)
Funding in the category of $250,000 – $999,999 comes from two Soros entities, the Foundation to Promote Open Society and the Open Society Institute. But a similar amount is also listed from the U.S. Department of State.

In an interesting development, former Obama State Department official Anne-Marie Slaughter was just named as the New America Foundation’s next president, effective September 1.

As the Free Press conference was preparing to get under way here in Denver, The New America Foundation issued a release saying that its Open Technology Institute and Media Policy Initiative had “joined over 40 other public interest groups on a letter, led by former FCC Commissioner Michael Copps, that calls on President Obama to appoint an FCC chairperson committed to prioritizing the public interest, not one who works for the will of corporate interests.”

Copps was on the Friday panel hosted by former FCC official Mark Lloyd.

The outgoing FCC chairman, Julius Genachowski, has failed to subject Al Gore’s sale of Current TV to Al Jazeera to any scrutiny at all. But that doesn’t bother the left-wing “Free Press” organization one tiny bit. 

They seem to welcome government funding or sponsorship of media organizations, even if the money comes from the Obama Administration, Qatar or Russia.

Al Jazeera is funded by the pro-Jihadist government of Qatar and is regarded as the voice of the pro-terrorist Muslim Brotherhood.

On Sunday, the National Conference for Media Reform featured a panel discussion titled, “Manufacturing Terror: The Media’s Anti-Arab and Anti-Muslim Problem,” with Ahmed Shihab-Eldin of HuffPost Live. He is a former producer for Al Jazeera. 

http://www.trevorloudon.com/2013/04/leftist-media-reform-conference-underway-in-denver/

Misguided By Voices

Liberal group linked to Soros won't fully disclose tax forms

A liberal nonprofit linked to an embattled North Carolina organization with deep ties into the left-wing philanthropic network is refusing to provide a copy of its tax forms as required by law.

State Voices is a nonprofit umbrella organization that supports state-based nonprofits to energize political involvement, in particular, it says, among “those who are underrepresented.”

A reporter from the Washington Free Beacon requested State Voices’ most recent IRS tax form over email and in person at the group’s Washington, D.C., office on March 7 and regularly returned to the office over the past month to reiterate the request. Two reporters went on Monday morning, April 8, to request the form once more.

A State Voices official directed the two reporters on Monday to the group’s online form. However, the 990 available online lacks a Schedule B, which contains the names of donors and is typically redacted. Signatures on the portion of the form available online have also been redacted, meaning it would not qualify under the “widely available” exception to the requirement that a 990 must be presented upon request.

The official indicated she would not be of any more assistance and directed the reporters to call State Voices’ communications director.

The communications director did not return a request for comment.

IRS rules mandate that barring any “unusual circumstances” a tax-exempt organization provide its Form 990 the day of an in-person request.

State Voices was caught up in controversy last month surrounding the liberal North Carolina nonprofit BluePrint NC. BluePrint was linked to a heavily partisan strategy memo that encouraged, among other things, sending political operatives to follow Republican state politicians and document their “every move.” The memo also contained polling data and messaging points tailored against the state’s Republican leadership.

The email that allegedly contained the strategy memo and other electoral information listed a State Voices official as one of the recipients. BluePrint NC’s director Sean Kosofsky denied his group sent out the strategy memo, although he did not distance himself from it.

Kosofsky also sits on State Voices’ board of directors and serves as secretary.

BluePrint and State Voices are 501(c)3 nonprofit organizations, meaning they are barred from partisan electioneering activities.

George Soros, a well-known liberal donor and founder of the liberal dark money group Democracy Alliance, is just one of several liberal financers of State Voices, records show.

According to the portions of State Voices’ 2011 tax form available online, the group brought in well over $5 million in “contributions and grants” over that year.

Data provided by the Capital Research Center indicate that the Foundation to Promote Open Society, part of the Soros-backed Open Society Foundations, gave State Voices more than $1 million in 2011.

One 2011 grant for $220,000 was given “to support the Wisconsin civic engagement project.” Wisconsin’s Republican Gov. Scott Walker faced a recall election the next year after his opponents secured enough petition signatures to force the recall early in 2012. The same foundation gave State Voices $250,000 in 2010 for the same reason.

A representative of Open Society Foundations said there was no connection between the grant and the recall election and that “We do not have record of funding State Voices for Wisconsin specific efforts.”

Overall, Soros’s foundations have pumped almost $2.3 million into State Voices since 2008.

The Gill Foundation, a pro-gay rights group founded by liberal dark money guru and Democracy Alliance member Tim Gill, also strongly supports State Voices.

The Gill Foundation gave $375,000 to State Voices in 2011. The smallest grant, $25,000, was intended as “general operating support for Ohio voice.” It is unclear if this was in preparation for the 2012 election battle in Ohio. The Gill Foundation had given only $150,000 before 2011.

A Gill Foundation spokesman said the group does not comment on their grants. The Gill Foundation’s website describes States Voices as one of its “Progressive Allies.”

The Gill Foundation’s senior vice president for programs, Katherine Peck, serves as the chair of State Voices’ board of directors.

State Voices’ connections to progressive groups extend into the group’s staff. The group’s executive director used to work at the Center for Progressive Leadership, while others worked for a state office of Common Cause and the Congressional Black Caucus.

A spokeswoman for George Soros’s Open Society Foundations said the groups’ support for State Voices “is to advance nonpartisan civic and community engagement of underrepresented constituencies who face historic and ongoing barriers to full participation in our democracy and equality in our society.”

Targeting “underrepresented constituencies” raises red flags among some critics of liberal nonprofits like State Voices and BluePrint NC. Matthew Vadum, senior editor for Capital Research Center, called that term “code for Democratic voters.”

These nonprofits “were vital in helping to get the vote out for President Obama in the last election,” Vadum said.

Many of State Voices’ grants in 2011 were for either “civic and voter mobilization” or “voter outreach activities,” according to its 2011 tax form.

Such groups skirt election law by focusing their efforts on nonpartisan groups, Vadum said. “They can’t overtly be pro-Democrat. Often the line is very thin.”

The spokeswoman for the Open Society Foundations defended the foundations’ grants to State Voices.

“A more engaged citizenry, which includes all members of a community, advances the necessary elements in an open society including, educational equity, a fair economy, an open democracy, and racial justice,” she said.

“The Open Society Foundations is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, and we do not support political candidates or parties,” she said.

http://freebeacon.com/misguided-by-voices/
 

No comments: