Sarah Palin’s Dad Reportedly "Horribly Harassed" by the IRS Six Times
By Daniel DohertyThat is, according to Chuck Heath Jr. (Sarah Palin's older brother), who wrote this on his Facebook page last weekend (h/t PJ Media):
Coincidence? You decide.Don’t expect the mainstream media to pick this story up, either. And by the way, even if you are very skeptical -- and don’t believe Sarah Palin’s father was targeted at all by the IRS, let alone six times -- this might pique your interest. The WSJ reported last night that it’s looking increasingly unlikely criminal charges will be filed against anyone over the IRS scandal. What? In short, we’re told, the federal bureaucrats running the agency had no idea what they were doing, or something .
My father, who worked multiple jobs and faithfully and honestly paid his taxes for fifty years, had never heard a word from the IRS. In 2008, his daughter was tapped to run for vice president of the United States. Since that time, he has been, in his words "horribly harassed" six times by the agency. They've tried to dig up something on him but he's always operated above board.
Government and politics are ugly. Kudos to the few that are trying to clean it up.
PK'S NOTE: I'm shocked, shocked I tell you:
FBI Will Not File Charges Against IRS for Targeting Conservatives
By William BigelowThe FBI will not file criminal charges against the IRS for targeting conservative groups, according to law enforcement officials.
The official line is that the FBI didn’t find political bias or “enemy hunting” which would justify filing charges against the agency. The FBI insists that the IRS was simply a mismanaged bureaucracy enforcing rules it did not understand.
The case is still under investigation, but as time passes officials say the case for filing charges becomes less and less likely unless unexpected evidence is discovered.
The GOP has been vocal about their doubts that the Obama administration would truly investigate the IRS malfeasance; last week Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, said he doubted the impartiality of the Justice Department prosecutor running the investigation because she was an Obama donor.
The Democrats, to no one’s surprise, insist that the IRS did not act criminally, claiming that liberal groups received the same treatment from the IRS.
6 million now covered by Obamacare? Not quite…
By Meredith Jessup
The White House has proudly proclaimed
that thanks to the president’s health care law, 6 million Americans now
have “quality, affordable health coverage.” But what does that really mean?
CNN Money’s Tami Luhby explains how this figure is “somewhat misleading”:
– 2.1 million Americans signed up for private health insurance through the federal and state exchanges through the end of December.– 3.9 million people learned they’re eligible for Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) in October and November.The squishiness lies in the Medicaid number. The 3.9 million figure includes people who were already on Medicaid and are just renewing, as Marilyn Tavenner, the administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services noted in a blog postlate last month. So not all of these folks have coverage due to Obamacare.
Appeals court strikes down net neutrality
By Kate TummarelloA federal appeals court on Tuesday struck down the Obama administration’s net-neutrality rules.
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Federal Communications Commission overstepped its authority by prohibiting Internet providers from treating traffic differently based on where its coming from.
By classifying Internet access as an “information service” as opposed to a “telecommunications service” — which is the classification used for traditional telephone companies — the FCC cannot impose its “anti-discrimination” and “anti-blocking” rules on Internet providers, the court said.
“Given that the Commission has chosen to classify broadband providers in a manner that exempts them from treatment as common carriers, the Communications Act expressly prohibits the Commission from nonetheless regulating them as such.”
The decision is blow to President Obama, who made net neutrality a campaign pledge in 2008, and erases one of the central accomplishments of former FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski.
PK'S NOTE: Does no one there see something wrong with 1.1 trillion just to get us through October?
Congressional Leaders Announce ‘Bipartisan’ $1.1 Trillion Spending Bill
Top congressional negotiators Monday night released a “bipartisan” $1.1 trillion spending bill that would pay for the operations of government through October and finally put to rest the bitter budget battles of last year.
The massive measure fleshes out the
details of the budget deal that Congress passed last month. That pact
gave relatively modest relief to the Pentagon and domestic agencies from
the deep budget cuts they would otherwise face.
The bill would avert spending cuts that
threatened construction of new aircraft carriers and next-generation
Joint Strike Fighters. It maintains rent subsidies for the poor, awards
federal civilian and military workers a 1 percent raise and beefs up
security at U.S. embassies across the globe. The Obama administration
would be denied money to meet its full commitments to the International
Monetary Fund but get much of the money it wanted to pay for
implementation of the new health care law and the 2010 overhaul of
financial regulations.
...To be sure, there is plenty for both
parties to oppose in the legislation. Conservatives face a vote to
finance implementation of President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul
and Wall Street regulations, both enacted in 2010 over solid Republican
opposition. A conservative-backed initiative to block the Environmental
Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gas emissions was dumped
overboard and social conservatives failed to win new restrictions on
abortion.
But conservatives can take heart that
overall spending for daily agency operations has been cut by $79
billion, or 7 percent, from the high-water mark established by Democrats
in 2010. That cut increases to $165 billion, or 13 percent, when cuts
in war funding and disaster spending are accounted for. Money for
Obama’s high-speed rail program would be cut off, and rules restricting
the sale of less efficient incandescent light bulbs would be blocked.New spending bill riddled with special ‘green’ handouts
By Michael BastaschThe appropriations bill Congress released Monday night is riddled with green handouts, including generous subsidies to renewable energy companies.
The bill allocates $10.2 billion to the Energy Department to support various types of energy, including commercializing green energy. Renewable energy and energy efficiency programs are allocated $1.9 billion to help commercialize green technologies — just as a loan
to the failed solar company Solyndra was supposed to do.It’s not just green energy that gets subsidies — fossil fuels and nuclear power together get nearly $1.5 billion in Energy Department spending.
PK'S NOTE: For more detail on waste in the Omnibus Bill, be sure to check out:
Heritage Experts Weigh In On Massive Omnibus Spending Bill
The Lamest Possible Rationale for NSA Spying
By Daniel J Mitchell....But you won’t be surprised to learn that defenders of the NSA have come up with a can’t-miss way of defining success.
Senior administration officials…say it has been valuable in knocking down rumors of a plot and in determining that potential threats against the United States are nonexistent. Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. calls that the “peace of mind” metric.Yes, your eyes did not deceive you.You actually read correctly. The government wants us to acquiesce to a loss of privacy because we will learn that there are no threats and we’ll have “peace of mind.”
That has to be the lamest justification for government power that I’ve ever read.
This is even more preposterous than asserting that we should squander $1 trillion per year on anti-poverty programs, not because that redistribution will help the poor, but rather because it makes leftists feel better about themselves.
...Keep in mind that the NSA is just one cog in the machinery of government. So if you’re worried about the NSA’s intrusion and power, then you should also worry about the power of the IRS. If you’re concerned about the IRS’s authority, then you also should fret about the Obamacare exchanges. And if you think the Obamacare exchanges give the government too much knowledge and power, then you should be agitated about “know-your-customer” laws that require banks to spy on their customers. And if you’re not happy about those money-laundering rules, then you surely should be dismayed about asset-forfeiture rules. And if you don’t approve of government stealing property, then maybe you don’t like government accumulation of power for the Drug War. And if the failed War on Drugs rubs you the wrong way, then perhaps you…I better stop now. I think you get the point.
The President’s “Pivot” Away from Obamacare
By Shawn MitchellThe idea the president is pivoting to inequality is too rich. Redistribution is the organizing principle of his presidency. Taking from the Americans he calls “the haves,” the “fat cats” and giving to those he calls “the poor” and “have nots” has been his constant goal. It’s his guiding star, raison de etre, his highest priority.
He declared his intentions plainly when he told Joe the Plumber we’ll all be better off if he can spread the wealth around. He designed his health law, auto bailout, Gulf spill clean up--every major initiative of his presidency--with the intent to force money from wealthier people and institutions to less wealthy ones. His drop dead requirement in last year’s fiscal cliff negotiations was imposing higher taxes on “the wealthiest Americans” If he hasn’t been out there trying to redistribute his way to a more equal America, what exactly has he been doing?
Pivot shmivot. He’s desperate to talk about something other than the debacle called Obamacare, so he brazenly announced “a new direction.” His media cheerleaders locked arms and did a high kick while relaying his nonsense.
It’s not working, by the way. Inequality is soaring on his watch. It’s going up because government managing the economy doesn’t work. It doesn’t lift the poor. It chokes the investment, startups, expansions, growth and opportunity the poor need to get jobs and climb the economic ladder.
...I’ve seen and learned a lot since that day and would phrase things differently today. Too often, Republicans lose sight of freedom in pursuit of contributions, votes, and power. They join in the project of growing government. Today, I would speak of conservatives, or defenders of liberty, rather than assigning love of freedom as a general Republican trait.
But the battle we are in is still the one Ken and I discussed. Some people want to use government power to try to engineer society into “fair” outcomes, more equal outcomes. One of them is the most powerful man on earth.
America's Dwindling Economic Freedom
Regulation, taxes and debt knock the U.S. out of the world's top 10.
By Terry MillerWorld economic freedom has reached record levels, according to the 2014 Index of Economic Freedom, released Tuesday by the Heritage Foundation and The Wall Street Journal. But after seven straight years of decline, the U.S. has dropped out of the top 10 most economically free countries.
For 20 years, the index has measured a nation's commitment to free enterprise on a scale of 0 to 100 by evaluating 10 categories, including fiscal soundness, government size and property rights. These commitments have powerful effects: Countries achieving higher levels of economic freedom consistently and measurably outperform others in economic growth, long-term prosperity and social progress. Botswana, for example, has made gains through low tax rates and political stability.
Those losing freedom, on the other hand, risk economic stagnation, high unemployment and deteriorating social conditions. For instance, heavy-handed government intervention in Brazil's economy continues to limit mobility and fuel a sense of injustice.
It's not hard to see why the U.S. is losing ground. Even marginal tax rates exceeding 43% cannot finance runaway government spending, which has caused the national debt to skyrocket. The Obama administration continues to shackle entire sectors of the economy with regulation, including health care, finance and energy. The intervention impedes both personal freedom and national prosperity.
The record of increasing economic freedom elsewhere makes it inexcusable that a country like the U.S. continues to pursue policies antithetical to its own growth, while wielding its influence to encourage other countries to chart the same disastrous course. The 2014 Index of Economic Freedom documents a world-wide race to enhance economic opportunity through greater freedom—and this year's index demonstrates that the U.S. needs a drastic change in direction.
The Idol of Equality
To put equality ahead of liberty is to war against human nature.
By Victor Davis Hanson...The problem with destroying liberty in service to mandated sameness is obvious, driven by Hesiod’s second, destructive envy: It has never worked, because it is contrary to human nature — both man’s acquisitive habits and the fact that we are not all born into the world equal in every respect. Instead, forced equality erodes personal initiative, undermines the rule of law, ruins the honesty of language, and requires a degree of coercion antithetical to a free society.
...Finally, the war to subordinate liberty is contrary to the idea of human freedom and thus always demands ever more coercion. The longer Obama remains well below a 50 percent approval rating, the more we will witness mandates by executive fiat, the selective enforcement of settled law, and controversial appointees selected on the basis of progressive ideology rather than proven competence and administrative expertise.
Historically the reaction to state-mandated equality is usually either flight — from the Soviet Union and the captive nations of Eastern Europe, from present-day France, from Detroit, from California — or a sort of psychological cocooning, in which citizens fearful that they are in the crosshairs of progressive government drop out, keep quiet, and hope their success can survive the taxman, the regulator, the popular press, and the fury of the mob.
The irony is that free people usually create far more wealth than the coerced, which makes the lower echelons better off, a fact that reminds “equality” is usually about empowering progressive elites rather than materially helping the poor. Moreover, in a free society, there are all sorts of forces — religion, constantly improving and ever cheaper technology, family pressures, honor, shame, philanthropy — that redistribute wealth either naturally or through the consent of the giver, and far more effectively than creating a huge government equalocracy that seeks power to bully others and exempt itself.
Home Energy Audits
By Henry PercyThe Department of Energy is flogging use of software that measures home energy use. Here's how it works:
A trained, "qualified assessor" comes to your home -- for a fee -- and collects approximately 40 pieces of data about the home's "envelope" (e.g., walls, windows, heating and cooling systems) during an hour-long walk-through.
I wonder if a "qualified assessor" is as qualified and vetted as an ObamaCare exchange navigator? Sure, sign me up for a troll to spend an hour poking through my house.
In a few years this audit can be rolled into a total assessment of you as a person: healthcare use, eating habits, exercise regimen, gasoline consumption, home energy use, etc., all summarized and sent out by the IRS so you can file it with your 1040 and get the appropriate credits and, more importantly, pay the richly-deserved fines or assessments or whatever euphemism they think up. It's so comforting to know our custodians are looking out for our best interests.
PK'S NOTE: And this is someone that half the country wants as President? Yeah. But to them this is ok and Chris Christie isn't (not that I am in any way in favor of Progressive Christie).
How Hillary's 'Hit List' Struck Fear in the Hearts of Democrats
By William BigelowA new book jointly written by The Hill’s Amie Parnes and Politico’s Jonathan Allen, HRC: State Secrets and the Rebirth of Hillary Clinton, details how the Hillary Clinton campaign composed a political hit list of those who had betrayed Clinton in the 2008 presidential campaign and supported Barack Obama instead.
The book asserts that the list was finalized in June 2008 after months of keeping score of those who stuck with Hillary and those who stabbed her in the back. The job of finalizing the list fell to Kris Balderston, deputy assistant to Bill Clinton during his presidency and later Hillary’s legislative director and deputy chief of staff in the Senate, and Adrienne Elrod, who interned in the White House in 1996 and moved on to senior posts on Capitol Hill.
The book notes that the duo had been updating a list of those who had endorsed Hillary and those who had endorsed Obama for months. They used a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet to go into great detail about exactly why candidates abandoned Hillary. One member of Hillary’s campaign team said:
We wanted to have a record of who endorsed us and who didn’t, and of those who endorsed us, who went the extra mile and who was just kind of there. And of those who didn’t endorse us, those who understandably didn’t endorse us because they are [Congressional Black Caucus] members or Illinois members. And then, of course, those who endorsed him but really should have been with her… that burned her.The Immorality of Leaving Iraq and Afghanistan
Obama “ends the war,” but for civilians there it means the jihadists command the streets.
By Dennis Prager...As a result of the United States’ withdrawing its troops at the end of 2011:
In 2013, 7,818 Iraqi civilians were killed, higher than the 2008 toll of 6,787 (United Nations figures). In 2010, there were approximately ten car bombs per month; in 2013, there was an average of 71.
At great expenditure in money, lives, and limbs, the United States had defeated al-Qaeda in Iraq. American troops had turned such terrorist-dominated cities as Fallujah and Ramadi into relatively peaceful cities governed by pro-government, anti-al-Qaeda Sunnis. And al-Qaeda had been handed its greatest defeat.
...Discussing Iraq last week, White House spokesman Jay Carney said, “The president made a commitment to end the war in Iraq. He fulfilled that commitment.” The language Mr. Carney used is instructive. The president made a commitment “to end the war.”
That is how Democrats see abandoning countries to mass death: The “war ends.”
That is the amoral and provincial perspective of the Democrats. All the death, torture, and fighting that takes place because Americans have withdrawn doesn’t really matter. For the Democrats and others on the left — the self-proclaimed compassionate folks — the amount of suffering caused by America’s withdrawing its troops is just not important.
Prohibiting Iran from attack U.S. would harm nuke negotiations, says fmr. aide
A longtime aide for Secretary of State John Kerry is urging senators to oppose a new Iran sanctions measure because it would level tough penalties on Tehran should it carry out a terror attack against Americans anywhere in the world.
One of the requirements of a new bipartisan Iran sanctions bill in the Senate is that President Barack Obama certify “Iran has not directly, or through a proxy, supported, financed, planned, or otherwise carried out an act of terrorism against the United States or United States persons or property anywhere in the world” during nuclear negotiations with the West.
If Iran—one of the top global sponsors of terrorism—is caught committing an extremist act, the bill would require new sanctions to immediately take effect.
....Requiring Iran to cease its terror activities against the United States could harm the negotiations over its contested nuclear program, according to Levine.
“This language would mean that if, say, Hezbollah were to explode a bomb outside a U.S. firm’s office in Beirut, the sanctions would go into effect (because Iran gives financial and other support to Hezbollah) even if Iran’s nuclear activities and negotiations were completely in good faith,” Levine wrote in his analysis. “So, once again, the goalposts are being moved.”
...Senate insiders working on the sanctions bill expressed shock that its opponents are quibbling with congressional efforts to prohibit Iran from attacking America.
“This just shows the radical nature of the opposition to the bipartisan Iran bill in the Senate,” said one senior Senate aide. “To say that prohibiting terrorist attacks against America is moving the goalposts on Iran—wow, I’m just speechless.”
...As Congress fights to maintain pressure on Iran’s economy, the White House is poised to roll back sanctions under a recently inked nuclear deal with Tehran.
Iran will receive up to $7 billion in sanctions relief, including access to $4.2 billion that is currently restricted when the deal goes into effect on Jan. 20.
Additionally, Iran will see the reversal of sanctions on its petrochemical and auto imports as well as its gold and precious metals industry.
Tehran will also be able to license spare parts for its civil aviation and gain access to financial lifelines for humanitarian services, including medical services and tuition payments for Iranians studying abroad.
Iran Celebrates American 'Surrender'; Obama Says 'Give Peace a Chance'
By Joel B PollakIran's "moderate" president, Hassan Rouhani, tweeted this morning that "world powers," including the U.S., had "surrendered" to the "Iranian nation's will" in confirming a six-month interim nuclear deal that will allow the Iranian regime to continue its advanced centrifuge program and develop a new nuclear facility at Arak. President Barack Obama, meanwhile, implored Americans to "give peace a chance" with the Iran deal.
Though the Obama administration claims that the interim deal--which includes a secret side deal--will lead Iran to give up any ambitions of becoming a nuclear power, the regime has publicly declared that the agreement reached in Geneva last November is the first step in removing all sanctions, and that it virtually recognizes Iran's "right" to enrich uranium. All agree that it contradicts a decade of UN Security Council resolutions banning such enrichment.
Obama has threatened to veto new sanctions currently under consideration by Congress as a risk to the nuclear deal, even though the sanctions would not take effect until after the interim deal is over, and are designed to act as a deterrent against Iranian efforts to cheat on the agreement. The sanctions enjoy bipartisan support, though most support comes from Republicans: it enjoys 59 co-sponsors in the Senate, near a veto-proof majority.
Major Mexican Newspaper’s Investigation Makes Stunning Conclusion About the U.S. Gov’t and Notorious Sinaloa Cartel
By Jason HowertonAn investigation by major Mexican newspaper El Universal has concluded that the United States government worked with the Sinaloa cartel from 2000 and 2012 as part of a divide and conquer strategy. In exchange for intel on rival cartels, the U.S. government allegedly allowed the cartel to smuggle billions of dollars worth of drugs.
...Using court documents as evidence, El Universal reports that DEA agents met with high-level Sinaloa cartel officials more than 50 times since 2000. The relationship led to a “23-ton cocaine seizure” and other seizures from “various drug trafficking organizations,” according to former Justice Department prosecutor Patrick Hearn, who cited DEA special agent Steve Fraga.
...El Universal also talked to more than
one hundred active and retired police officers, prisoners and other
experts for its explosive report.
“The DEA agents met with members of
the cartel in Mexico to obtain information about their rivals and
simultaneously built a network of informants who sign drug cooperation
agreements, subject to results, to enable them to obtain future
benefits, including cancellation of charges in the U.S.,” the report
adds.
...As previously reported by TheBlaze,
the “logistics coordinator” also argued in court that “Operation Fast
and Furious” was part of the agreement to finance and arm the cartel in
exchange for valuable information that would help the government take
down its rival cartels.
The Sinaloa Cartel, headed by Joaquin
“El Chapo” Guzman, reportedly supplies 80 percent of the drugs that
enter Chicago and operates in various cities across the U.S.
The DEA did not comment on El Universal’s report.
PK'SNOTE: Now Fast and Furious is making more sense and why Obama asserted Executive Privilege in response to request from Issa for documents regarding F&F.
DEA working with drug cartel for more than a decade
By Rick Moran
This information sheds further light on the Fast and Furious
caper. Apparently, the DEA didn't care how many guns ended up in the
hands of Sinaloa cartel members - didn't care who they killed, including
border agents. They were only concerned about guns that ended up in
rival cartel hands. The story validates reports from last August -
totally ignored by most media - that Fast and Furious was meant as a
program to supply arms to Sinaloa:A high-ranking member of the Sinaloa drug cartel operative currently in U.S. custody alleges that Operation Fast and Furious was part of an agreement to finance and arm the Sinaloa cartel in exchange for information used to take down rival cartels, according to court documents.From the court document:
[T]he United States government at its highest levels entered into agreements with cartel leaders to act as informants against rival cartels and received benefits in return, including, but not limited to, access to thousands of weapons which helped them continue their business of smuggling drugs into Chicago and throughout the United States, and to continue wreaking havoc on the citizens and law enforcement in Mexico.
I could care less that we've been able to take down some drug kingpins from other cartels. The immorality of arming killers and allowing them to carry out their deadly business - which leads to hundreds of violent deaths in the US when gangs war on each other - is without question.
Who knew? Holder, obviously. He has been stonewalling Congress to keep his dirty little arrangement secret. That's got to stop. Holder and DEA leaders should be held accountable for the hundreds - perhaps thousands - of deaths that have resulted from our support of the Sinaloa cartel.
Funding to ‘observe and systemically analyze’ social media interactions
The federal government has committed $5 million to “mine and analyze” social media for studies on Americans’ drug habits.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) posted two matching grant announcements on Jan. 3, allotting a total of $5 million to be spent this year. The funding will go to several projects that will involve monitoring sites such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram to survey the population’s drug and alcohol use, and conduct “social media-based interventions” aimed at altering behaviors.
...The federal government is already funding studies for using social media to target health behavior. The National Library of Medicine is spending $30,000 to mine Facebook and Twitter, and learn how tweets can be used as “change-agents” for health behavior.
The NIH has also given $82,800 on how to use Twitter for surveillance on depressed people.
Omnibus Funds ‘Permanent Extended Coffee Break’ for Dozens of DOJ Employees
By J Christian Adams After the Court's Shelby decision, dozens of DOJ lawyers have nothing to do. But not one has been laid off.
Hans von Spakovsky has the inside scoop of the new omnibus spending bill. Most notably, the new bill funds the government jobs of dozens Department of Justice employees who no longer have any work to do after the Supreme Court struck down Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act. Von Spakovsky writes:
Of course, the other thing needed with the Civil Rights Division is a cutback in its budget, which has grown considerably, and gives Eric Holder the resources to file numerous suits challenging common sense voter ID, immigration, and other state laws he does not like. There are also at least two dozen lawyers and support staff in the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division who have seemingly had nothing to do since the U.S. Supreme Court declared the coverage formula for Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act unconstitutional in June 2013. These DOJ personnel who worked on Section 5 matters are now on a permanent, extended coffee break – yet not a single one of them has been laid off. This is an enormous waste of taxpayer funds that should have been eliminated by Congress.Permanent extended coffee break? Indeed.
Inside the Justice Department Civil Rights Division Voting Section, almost three dozen federal jobs were rendered irrelevant after the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby v. Holder. Sources report that after the decision, the employees have done next to nothing, or taken “extended coffee breaks” as von Spakovsky reports. Here are the federal employees von Spakovsky is referring to, and salaries from public records searches provided to PJ Media.
Berman, Robert; Deputy Chief, Section 5, $155,500
Bashir-Boulghassoul, Lema; Trial Attorney, Section 5, $136,134
Falwell, Marie; Equal Opportunity Assistant, Section 5, $56,791
Greene, Judybeth; Trial Attorney, Section 5, $155,500
Grigsby, Kevin; Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $64,548 Gyamfi, Stephanie, Lead Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $97,936
Hamilton-Hill, Sandra, Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $81,204
Harrison, Martin; Legal Technician (File Librarian), Section 5, $54,534
Hyatt, Joi; Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $70,794
Johnson, Phyllis; Case Management Specialist, Section 5, $65,343
Jones, Nadine; Legal Technician (Classifier), Section 5, $68,230
Kim, Elizabeth, Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $64,548
King, Ryan, Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $62,467
Le, Tran-Chau, Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $70,794
Lowell, Robert; Attorney Reviewer, Section 5, $155,500
Murray, Joseph, Lead Civil Rights Attorney (Trainer), Section 5, $97,936
Payne, Autumn; Lead Civil Rights Attorney, Section 5, $94,969
Powers, John; Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $79,864
Reed, Judith; Trial Attorney, Section 5, $155,500
Rich, James Eric; Trial Attorney, Section 5, $152,635
Riggins, Jesmond; Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $62,467
Riordan, Maureen; Trial Attorney, Section 5, $155,500
Robinson, Pamela; Secretary, Section 5, $52,061
Schaffer, Tracy; Lead Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $94,969
Soo-Tim, Tiffani; Secretary, Section 5, $ 43,616
Stafford, Suzanne; Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, (mostly works on FOIA), $92,341
Stephens, Jennifer; Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $62,467
Thorpe, Nicole; Supervisory Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $119,238
Travett, Rosita; Legal Technician, Section 5, $60,765
Wake, Brittany; Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $62,467
No comments:
Post a Comment